China, Bicycles, and Culture

I love Macro Polo. I read it regularly and urge anyone with a passing interest in China to give it a browse. I also love Macro Polo’s most recent post  about bikes in China. The love I have for the post is deep, because in the recesses of my heart exists a counterweight of hate for bicycles in Beijing. The almost romantic whirl of millions of wheel spokes captures many visitor’s hearts. The cursing of average commuters funneled into artificially narrow sidewalks induces PTSD for others.

I loved my bike in China. I loved that the back brakes didn’t work. I loved joining a throng of pedestrians and motorists with one governing rule: there are no rules. The secret to appreciating a foreign culture is to live as they do: eat their food, speak their language, and hurl concise insults at motorists you play chicken with.  My bike wasn’t just a way to drastically shorten my commute (leave it locked near your subway exit of choice), it was a quintessential manifestation of modern China, good and bad.

I have roughly 4,000 pictures of my time in Asia. One of the first folders I created is simply titled ‘bikes.’  These are my favorites.

Shared bikes in Beijing’s CBD clog sidewalks. Rush hour pedestrian traffic is greatly constrained due to this.

Users can pay more for ‘cooler’ bikes. Note the width of the tires in the second photo.

20170805_081759

Bikes can be found everywhere due to an army of shirtless men that deposit bikes (bikes are equipped with GPS) in high traffic areas.

Bikes can be found in crosswalks. Note the couple struggling to make their way across.

20180329_144641

Bikes can be found in rivers.

20170501_134746

Bikes can be found in piles.

20180626_143151

Most importantly, bikes can be found clogging sidewalks.

20180307_122327

There are many types of bikes. Pictured above are university bikes (清华大学).

20170328_205736

Bikes pulled by dogs.

Unwanted Bikes

20180223_074618

Really unwanted bikes.

In France in the 1880s, the cheapest model of bicycle listed in catalogs and sales brochures cost the equivalent of six months of the average worker’s wage. And this was a relatively rudimentary bicycle, “which had wheels covered with just a strip of solid rubber and only one brake that pressed directly against the front rim.” Technological progress made it possible to reduce the price to one month’s wage by 1910. Progress continued, and by the 1960s one could buy a quality bicycle inFrance for less than a week’s average wage. One can use bikes in France to see how purchasing power rose by a factor of 40 between 1890 and 1970.  Transportation, whether by Toyota or trike, matters.

20180416_133739

Thanks for reading.

中国芯和风险

 

10年前,北京曾有索爱全球最大工厂、诺基亚中国最大工厂,天津曾有摩托罗拉全球最大工厂。配合京东方、中芯国际,再加上北京最为发达的互联网产业,从组装加工、到高端零部件、到上层应用的移动时代全产业链,原本应该诞生在京津地区。

然而,京津押宝的三家顶尖手机外企全跪了,而原本被视为“山寨”的珠三角本土企业:华为、oppo、vivo,却崛起成为世界巨头(小米也不在北京生产)。

于是,长三角的台资/美资PC产业链、珠三角的内资手机产业链,加上与之配套的面板/芯片/零部件厂商,随着产业转移,大规模在以长江流域为主的内陆省会开花结果(最北达到西安、太原、郑州一线)。

而伴随着京津外资手机厂的倒闭,京津冀缺乏能容纳大量劳动力的PC/手机制造工厂,面板/芯片厂的新产能也不再落户京津冀。

于是,除了北京发达的互联网和金融产业外,津冀经济增长的新动能就消失了,再加上对高耗能高污染重工业的打压,津冀就愈发尴尬。

未来5-10年,伴随着人口老龄化,内陆省会和区域中心城市的产业、人口竞争将日趋激烈。吸引更多的产业人口、研发人才,争夺到电子和汽车产业链条的更多环节。特别的,如果能像珠三角一样培育出自己的消费电子品牌,那么其迈向人均3万美元中等发达世界的道路就打通了。

而中国芯、中国屏、中国车的例子都告诉我们,不要过于仰仗外资企业,外资企业的目的和市场化内资企业是不同的。外资的目的在于绕过中国的关税壁垒(在中国建芯片/面板/汽车厂)、在于降低成本。

而一个有志气的市场化内资企业,其目的则是向上向下打通产业链、打出自己的品牌、下力气研发(或者收购)容易被卡脖子的关键环节、拓展自己的生存空间,把自己的命运和国家的需求无形中捆绑在了一起:

  • 大连英特尔、无锡海力士、西安三星,典型的外资。来华目的只是为了便宜的土地、优惠的税费、以及绕过中国的关税,对当地经济有短期促进作用,但不可能依靠他们来构建起一套完整的产业链。
  • 中兴是内资,但不是有志气的内资,更像一个安逸的集成外包商。
  • 华为、腾讯、阿里、吉利、长城、京东方等等,属于“有志气的内资”,虽然各自达到的水准不同,离世界一流水平也还有差距,但他们的总体方向,是在市场中寻求突破和拓展,是他们在带领中国在各领域前行。

于是,问题就很清晰了。“中国芯”和一流水平的差距有多大?我们要依靠谁来实现中国集成电路产业的突破?

总结一下:我国目前62万片/月产能的12寸芯片厂中,有46万片/月(74%)是外资/合资厂。大陆目前最大、最先进的芯片代工厂中芯国际,其年营收只有台积电的1/10,技术差距为5-6年。

Asset Prices and Protests

A crucial aspect of ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ is the absence of risk in key assets, namely real estate. As I have previously written, Chinese policy to increase household wealth revolves around strategic asset inflation. There is an explicit idea in Chinese society that certain asset classes cannot lose value and value must always increase.

The Chinese stock market is one such asset class. This article explains how, in 2015, China set a floor for its stock market by ordering brokers to not sell below 4,500 points. The stock market was to fall no lower. It worked. Life moves on. Asset inflation continues.

 In Beijing, homes that went for an average of around 4,000 yuan (US$580) per square metre in 2003 are now above 60,000 yuan (US$8,600) a square metre, according to property price data provider creprice.cn

The key questions should then be:

1.) Can this go on forever?

2.) What happens when it stops?

Luckily there is some insight. People have been protesting drops in real estate prices for years. Here is a good article from the SCMP on the matter. Here is what a real estate protest looks like (it is really worth watching).

Something that foreign pundits regularly misunderstand about China is the amount of protests that happen. They do happen and are often allowed to happen. For example, here is a good video of recent veteran protests. However, it is worth watching how the expectation of constant growth interacts with a slowing -healthy or otherwise- Chinese economy.

 

Capital Scarcity

In this 7 minute YouTube video, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is unable to answer Senator John Kennedy’s question. Kennedy asks why a current account deficit is bad for America if the dollars are later recycled to fund investment in America. The key question from Senator Kennedy is as follows:

If we are running a negative in our current account, our financial account has got to be positive, right? Which means that those dollars are coming back to the United States and they’re being invested.

 

Mr. Lighthizer should have said that Senator Kennedy’s example is assuming that foreign investment is productive and has no ill effect on the US economy.  If capital in America was scarce, foreign funds could fund the gap between domestic investment needs and low domestic savings. The problem here is that America has the deepest, most liquid, open capital markets in the world. American banks are industry leaders and capable of funding America’s investment needs.  If America’s domestic financing needs are met by American financial institutions, what are the effects of America’s consistent capital account surplus?

1.) Excess capital could find its way into asset bubbles. Asset bubbles in real estate, particularly regarding Chinese investment, have become normal. Speculative flows of money into assets can make households feel richer. For example, if you perceive the value of your house as increasing due to living in an asset bubble, you may be more willing to spend more or take on additional debt. Lastly, if American firms lessen their investment or productive investments are funded by foreign capital, America is outsourcing its capital allocation mechanisms to foreigner institutions. This could have great ramifications for a country if the foreign institution is run by communists, building military islands in the South China Sea, or responsible for the slavery of its ethnic citizens. Becoming a part of the capital allocation mechanism may also let a foreign institution interrupt democratic debate, because those who benefit or have the best relationship with said institution may be unwilling to abandon their patron.

2.) Good FDI, fairly logically, means that a foreign entity has industry knowledge or practices that make them competitive in a domestic market. A win-win is created by the foreign entity being competitive in a large market and the foreign market learning new knowledge/practice. Why would a developing country so regularly invest in a developed country considering the developing country is much less likely to have best practices?

capital_epa_net

I think there are a few reasons that Robert Lighthizer didn’t give Senator Kennedy a satisfactory answer. However, if he did give him an answer in which he stated that America’s problem isn’t its trade account but its open capital account, he would have to admit that tariffs won’t fix the problem and his administration is failing.